Final Exam Study Guide Fall Semester 2012 Essay

Why is it said that the U.S. has a dual address system? There is a federal discriminative system and 50 adduce coquet systems. What is the signification of the concept of legal power? A dally has the safe to hear a particular graphic symbol of chance. What is the meaning of the ism of presumption of validity? court of justices must assume that, unless the center of the evince is clearly to the contrary, legislatures would non enact or executives sign into skilfulfulness measures which violate the constitution.What is the meaning of the term st be decisis?? Legal term meaning permit the decision stand. Establishes precedents stand unless every overgovern. Judges may over rein if they live with compelling primer coats to establish new precedents.What is the disparity amid a usurpation and a felony? An anti-social conduct that is relatively minor is called a misdemeanor. A felony is a dis assignly conduct that is more severe. What happens in the so fart of a di vergence between a state uprightness and a subject field rectitude of nature or a state freshness and a U.S. treaty? federal official justness overrides state integrity any day. What is meant by judicial activism? translation of the constitution holding that the spirit of the times and the needs of the nation sewer legitimately influence judicial decision. Judicial self-restraint? a self-imposed limitation on judicial decision makingHow ar federal official enunciates chosen? Federal judges atomic number 18 nominated by the president and voted on by the senate. What is the term of a Federal judge? Term ends when nicety dies. Why has the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee come chthonic fire for the manner in which it screens appointees to the U.S. irresponsible judgeship? Justices be declined if they politically go against the senate. Why did the committee reject Judge Robert Bork as a sovereign coquette justice? He did not politically flout with the democratic run s enate. What does it mean that Senators Joe Biden, Ted Kennedy and Howard Metzenbaum borked a compulsive courtyard nominee? They voted against a justice because of their political party.What was the tempera ment of the political uproar over the nomination of Clargonnce Thomas to be a Supreme mash justice? He was accused of sexual assault. Who is Anita Hill? A law prof who accused Cl arnce Thomas of sexual assault.What are the provisions of Article tercet of the U.S. Constitution regarding the Federal judiciary? It establishes the judicial branch of the federal government. It establishes legal power between the courts based on subject matter or the nature of the parties. It declares that the power of judicial power of the United States shall be vested in unrivaled supreme court. There is no specific provision anywhere in article III giving Federal courts the power of judicial review. What was the im kettle of fishiveness of Marbury v. Madison? The case that established judicia l review. What is judicial review? review article by the Supreme judicatory of the constitutional validity of a legislative act. What, if anything, dismiss be d unmatched to over unit of ammunition a U.S. Supreme Court decision? Nothing can be d atomic number 53 unless it involves amending the constitution, or if the court patterns on nighthing that contradicts a previous ruling. Who go throughs the Supreme Courts set? The supreme court itself does.What is the rule of four? The supreme court all hears cases if it grants a judicial writ of certiorari. Where consent of four justices are given. What is a writ of certiorari? A common law writ issued by a superior court to unrivaled of inferior jurisdiction demanding the record of a particular case. What is the primary role of the U.S. Court of Appeals? To hear and dispose of the huge majority of cases appealed from the rule courts. What are U.S. District Courts? General tribulation courts of the unite states federal court sy stem that hears both civil and criminal cases. When would a Federal District Court pack jurisdiction in a case? If a case involved crimes against the united states, suits under case laws involving use of the mails, patent, copyright, trademark and other much(prenominal) technical matters and civil rights laws.What is the difference between a petit and a grand venire? Petit juries have 12 members who decide, based on evidence, if the suspect is guilty or not guilty. impressive juries indict people. Its functions is to decide if the government has a case or not. How are they chosen? Through a jury pool from those serving jury duty. What are their respective functions? To decide if the government has a case, and to decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty. Also if a person has win or lost a lawsuit.How do cases reach the U.S. Supreme Court? Through appellate and original jurisdiction. Mostly from appeals though sent from the court of appeals. at a lower place what limited circumstances may the U.S. Supreme Court coiffure original jurisdiction? When it accepts a suit if it feels a compelling reason to do so. Who determines the appellate jurisdiction of the U.S. Supreme Court?What are some of the political and ideological considerations involved in U.S. Supreme Court appointments? more often than not their party affiliation and how they interpret the constitution. Does race, gender, religion, ethnicity matter in a chairmans nomination of a Supreme Court justice? Yes.Who are the present nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court? What are their backgrounds? John G. Roberts Jr., Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy, head Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, St in time G. Breyer, Samuel Anthony Alito Jr., Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan.RELIGIONWhy did the authors of the Bill of Rights put sacred granting immunity first in the low Amendment? It is more of an article of peace. It was principal(prenominal)ly to change religion from politics. What are the wall of judicial separation and accommodationist positions on the Establishment article? Wall of separation believes that church and state should be entirely separated. No affiliation between the two. Accommodationists believe that no religion should be favored, scarcely all should be accommodated.Why have Americans had fewer problems with the Free work up clause than with the Establishment Clause? Free Exercise clauses are entirely in effect if the religions practices dont get in the modal value of any laws. Establishment clauses take on clauses that excuse kids from indoctrinate to go to church, this was genuinely controversial because atheist children were left out. Much more controversy in establishment clauses. What are some of the issues raised by groups like the Amish (Wisconsin v. Yoder), clerics Witnesses and other ghostly minorities regarding interpretation of the Free Exercise Clause? These releaseed laws to be bent for people of real religions. Wisconsin v. Yode r allows Amish children to be excused from civilize at 8th grade vs. the age 16. Jehovahs Witnesses are allowed to be exempt from the draft due to their pacifism.Why did the U.S. Supreme Court rule against entreaty in the popular civilises in the New York Regents prayer case (Engel v. Vitale, 1962)? It was said that New York could not write prayers. It is unconstitutional to do so.What was the nature of Madalyn Murrays goalions to the atomic number 101 school prayer/ record readings law? Her son was left out. Also she was athiest and she viewed the bible as merely a storybook. Why did the Schempp family object to the Pennsylvania law? They felt it was in bear infringement of the establishment clause in the first amendment, also it theologically went against the Schempps Unitarian views. What did the Supreme Court rule in the partner Murray-Schempp decision of 1963? It ruled 8-1 striking down both the Pennsylvania and Maryland laws requiring prayer.Under what circumstances ma y students have prayer at their heights school graduation ceremonies? As long as its student-led and is non-sectarian. whitethorn students form prayer and Bible try out groups and use universe school facilities for their meetings? Yes. What was the Equal Access Act of 1984? It required in the public eye(predicate) secondary schools to allow religious groups to meet on school property if other groups exist. crimson if one group is allowed to use the facilities, the school becomes a limited capable forum where all groups can use the facilities. What did the Court rule when it was challenged in the 1990 Mergens case? 8-1 upholding the law. May public college officials deny use of campus facilities to religious groups for Bible study and prayer meetings? No, it is discriminatory.One of the most controversial areas is that of parochiaid, or state aid of various types to parochial schools. What three-part test did the Supreme Court gussy up in Lemon v. Kurtzman? It was called the L emon Test where there must be a secular purpose rather than a religious purpose, the law cannot advance or inhibit religion, and government cannot be entangled in it. What was the fate of the law, challenged in Lemon, authorizing partial payment (secular subjects only if) of teachers salaries in parochial schools? It was impaired down. May state and local school districts finance bus rides for children attending non-public schools (Everson v. visiting card of Education of Ewing Township, NJ, 1947)? Yes. What is the child benefit theory? The law back up the school child rather than a particular religious group.What did the Court rule in June, 2002, in the landmark Cleveland, Ohio, School Voucher domesticize Case, Zelman v. Simmons-Harris? It held that 5-4 that Cleveland program did not offend the establishment clause. fucking public school students, on parental request, be released from class to attend religion classes, conducted on public school property, during the school day , where the program is supervised by public school administrators (McCullom v. Champaign, Ill., Board of Education)? No, it is not viewed to be abiding by separation of church and state laws. stop students, on parental request, be dismissed from classes to attend churches or synagogues, as part of a program of religious education in public schools (Zorach v. Clauson)? Yes.Under what circumstances are courts apt(predicate) to uphold or declare unconstitutional giving birth displays on public property at Christmas time? Whether or not other religious symbols are there to balance it, also secular symbols like Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer. What did the Supreme Court rule in Donnelly v. Lynch? It upheld the nativity scene on the basis that both religious and secular symbols. County of Allegheny, Pa. v. ACLU? The court concluded that the nativity scene with the words glory in the highest was promoting Christian religion, but the menorah was okay.In the area of free exercise of relig ion, can children of Jehovahs Witnesses be expelled from public schools for refusal to salute the American flag? Yes. Why do the Witnesses object to flag salutes or standing for the national anthem? They believe it violates one of the 10 commandments. What did our highest court rule in Minersville, Pa., School District v. Gobitis? 8-1 stating that one could not refuse to pledge allegiance to the flag. West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette? The court reversed itself, saying it was okay to excuse ones self from saluting the flag or standing at the national anthem due to religious beliefs.How did the Supreme Court broaden the rights of careful objectors during the Vietnam War? It allowed any passifists who were against not only one war, but all wars to be exempt from the draft rather than just religious passifists. What did the Court rule in the Seeger, Welsh and Gillette cases? Seeger ruled that a belief in a traditional God or religion was unnecessary in localise to be exempt. Welsh held that humanistic conviction was equivalent to religion. In Gillette held that one must be counteractd to all wars in order to be exempt.What did the Court hold in the Mormon polygamy case (Reynolds v. U.S.)? They ruled against it. Polygamy is ineligible in Utah. Why did the Roberts Court grant a religious exemption from some civil rights laws in Hossana-Tabor v. E.E.O.C. (2012)? The separation between church and state allows this.EXPRESSION (SPEECH AND PRESS)There are a number of theories nearly how the send-off Amendments free speech and press guarantees ought to be interpreted. What is the absolutistic view, held by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the late Justices Hugo sinister and William O. Douglas? They spurned line-drawing, what the law says goes in a literal sense. when it says no law, it means no law. The two-tier theory, associated with the late political philosopher Alexander Meiklejohn? The press may say anything active the governm ent. The line-drawing position, held by most judges? Establishing a number of standards to guide them between permissible and impermissible forms of free expression. What is meant by the preferred freedoms concept? First amendment freedoms should be given potential treatment by the court because they are essential in a democratic society. What is commercial speech? savoir-faire done on behalf of an individual or a company in order to produce a profit.Why did John Stuart donkeywork oppose censorship in his classic work, On Liberty? John Stuart Mill believes that the majority should not always influence the minority because if the majority is wrong, past the truth goes unheard, but if the majority is right, past the minority doesnt empathise why they are wrong. What is the argument against the suppression of ideas that we find not only unpopular, but raze hateful? All ideas must be allowed, even if those ideas are sexist, racist, or angering.If, as judges say, the line must be d rawn somewhere and free expression is not an absolute value, then what guidelines have they used to draw that line? Anything can be said, even violent things, as long as there is no evidence of intention to commit lawless acts. The right to swing your arms ends right as my nose begins. What is the clear and present danger principle (Schenck v. U.S.)? Enacted during WWI which created the Espionage act, where nought could say anything that interfered with allied war efforts like encouraging young men to dodge the draft, or any other armed forces recruiting. The evil proclivity test (Gitlow v. New York )?The government does not protect the expression which created a tendency toward illegal actions. The clear and probable danger test (Dennis v. U.S.)? The law prohibited the advocacy to overthrow the U.S. government and the conspiracy as well. What did the Supreme Court rule in the Smith Act cases of the 1950s? it is illegal to violently overthrow a government. 70 communists were convi cted after this was established. What was the significance of Yates v. U.S.? true theoretical advocacy to overthrow the U.S. government by force and abandon was a judicially protected right.What is the difference between liberty and license? Liberty means freedom under law ( the right to do something as long as nobody is hurt.) License is an abuse of liberty( such as libelous publication or slanderous speech).What is meant by the doctrine of no prior restraint on publication? A doctrine that states that published material does not have to be pre-screened in order to be published and viewed by the public. What was the significance of Near v. Minnesota? The court ruled that the press gag law was unconstitutional due to the feature that it restricts freedom of the press. New York measure-Washington Post v. U.S.? These themes published pentagon papers that were a study of the U.S. decision making in the Vietnam War. It embarrassed the President and the government. This resulted in the lifting of the district courts restraining order on the press due to the mischance to prove that publication of the documents jeopardized national security. How and when can First Amendment values jar with those of the Sixth Amendment? The right of the defendant in a criminal case to a fair trial by an impartial jury of his or her peers. Sometimes, judges have concluded, the press has conducted trial by newspaper.What are confining orders, called gag orders by the media? The courts force of the media to withhold certain information from being published for varying circumstances that may halter a period court case or could cause revile to someones (possibly the governments) reputation What steps can trial judges take to protect the rights of the accused?Through right to state laws, closing court rooms to the media, and implementing gag orders on certain subjects. Do reporters enjoy a privileged relationship with their sources? The supreme court says no, but there are shiel d laws that allows reporters to withhold certain information. What is the meaning of the formulate tan the source? Giving up the identity of a journalists source so that person can be questioned in court. Can reporters be held in contempt of court and jailed for refusal to turn over notes, tapes, or to offer testimony when so ordered (Branzburg v. Hayes)? YesWhat, in theory, is the problem with shield laws? Some believe that it is a mistake to let the government grant immunity, this implies that the state can also withdrawal it. Can judges close their courtrooms to the press and public during preliminary proceedings (Gannett v. DePasquale)? Yes. Can judges close down a trial itself, excluding media and public ( liberalmond Newspapers v. Virginia)? No, the right to attend criminal trials is implicit in the grantee of the first amendment.Do television cameras in the courtroom prevent the defendant from receiving a fair trial? Sometimes, in the pre-trial stage, the jury is permeated with information about the case that entrust not allow a fair trial. What did the Supreme Court rule in Estes v. Texas and Chandler v. Florida? The overturning of the swindling conviction of petitioner Billy Sol Estes, holding that his fourteenth Amendment due process rights were violated by the publicity associated with the pretrial hearing. For Chandler v. Florida canyon cameras and electronic media are permitted in the judicial proceedings subject to the control of the presiding judge. When are TV cameras permitted in the courtroom today? Always, but it can be taken away by the presiding judges accord. What is the incident with respect to Federal courts? Cameras are not allowed in federal courts.Do political candidates have the right to reply to editorial attacks by the media? Yes. What happened to the Florida law giving them such a right when it was challenged in Miami Herald v. tornillo? It was immediately stricken down because a newspaper involves a decisive process of ed itorial judgment that may not be modulate by the state.What is meant by symbolic free expression? Expressing ideas by silent, non-verbal communication. What did the Supreme Court rule in the draft-card burning case (OBrien v. U.S.)? It was criminally illegal. tamper v. Des Moines? Wearing black arm-bands in protest of Vietnam could not be outlawed because this form of expression is silent and caused little disruption. Do Americans have the right to burn the flag? Currently, Yes. What did the Supreme Court rule in Texas v. Johnson? It is legal free speech to desecrate a flag. U.S. v. Eichman? Flag sacrilege is a form of constitutional free speech. What was the fate of the Flag vindication Amendment? It fell 1 vote short with 66 for and 34 against. tho 3 republicans unconnected it. How did Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton vote on the measure? They both opposed the amendment.What are fighting words? Inflammatory speech inviting violence, which are not protected by the 1s t and 14th amendments. Calling a officeholder a fascist is an example. What is hate speech? Speech that arouses anger, alarm, and resentment toward others on the basis of race, gender, creed, color, and religion. What did the Court decide in R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992) and Virginia v. Black (2003)? Supreme court ruled that the city statute against cross burning is unconstitutional, it interferes with free speech rights. For Virginia v. Black, the court ruled that making a law against cross burning is not unconstitutional, but cross burning cannot be considered prima facie evidence of intent to discriminate.What did the Supreme Court rule in Snyder v. Phelps in 2011? Speech on the sidewalk about a public issue cannot be liable for a tort of emotional distress, even if the speech is outrageous. Court ruled 8-1 about it. Should free speech include the right to carry signs reading God Hates Fags, Thank God for dead Soldiers, Thank God for 9-11? No.Have some universities, such as the University of Michigan and University of Wisconsin, gone too far in banning unworthy speech (ethnic and racial slurs), according to the Federal courts? Yes, they are in violation of the first amendment.What is libel? Libel is false printed or broadcast statements that specialize to damage someones reputation. Slander? False statements made by someone looking to damage someone elses reputation. What are the main elements which must be established to have actionable libel? defamation, identification, publication, and fault. What are the main defenses used by media in libel cases? That freedom of the press is paramount in a democratic society.What was the significance of New York Times v. Sullivan? It set a standard that one cannot sue a newspaper for libel unless one can address that he/she was the defamed party. What is actual malevolency? libelous remarks with knowledge that the remarks were false, or that there was lack of disregard on whether or not the remark was true. Wh at is hot news (AP.v.Walker)? news that is current and controversial, but not always journalistically accurate. What is the prudent publisher rule (Butts v. Curtis Publishing Co.)? Publishers must follow the professional standards of journalism. This included verification of facts, oddly when the deadline is less than monumental.What part of the Bill of Rights guarantees American citizens Freedom of Assembly? First amendment.m Freedom of Association? First amendment. Can cities require permits for parades, sound trucks and demonstrations? Yes Under what circumstances? To ensure peace and tranquility. Why did the ACLU argue on behalf of the Nazis in the Skokie, Illinois, case? They believed the Nazis potential to incite violence among the Jewish community did not warrant oppression of the right to assemble.Why was the Roberts Courts 2010 decision striking down part of the McCain-Feingold (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission) so controversial? It allowed corporations to fu nd ads and movies for and against presidential candidates. How did President Obama reply to the decision? He was very mad. He said foreign businesses are going to be funding these commercials now. What impact has this decision had on American elections? It has allowed much more money to be spent on elections. Rich corporations could potentially control an election.What was the impact of the courts striking down the Arizona Citizens full-strength Elections Act? It left a lot of people angry. Stating that it was meant to level the playing field, not restrict Free Speech. Those who opposed the law said in a democracy, campaigning is not supposed to be a game.